Leading Penn Foster's Strategic Rebrand: From Production Team to In-House Agency

Sector: eLearning, edtech, Higher Education

Challenge: Penn Foster Education, founded as the International Correspondence School in 1890, underwent a major transformation in 2019. Following a new brand strategy and the acquisition of its closest competitor and its eight sub-brands, the organization needed a complete rebrand. Our in-house team was experienced in creative production but had never led strategic brand work of this scale. As Creative Director, I was tasked with simultaneously upskilling the team and delivering a comprehensive rebrand that would unify the organization and position it for growth.

My Role: Creative Direction, Brand Strategy & Design, Workshop Facilitation, Team Development, UI Design

Collaborators: Sarah Kinney - Art Direction, Michael Brennan & Kerri Odell - Visual & Brand Design, Jim Healey - Project Management

Timeline: 6 months (2019-2020)

Team Impact: Transformed a 4-person production team into a strategic in-house agency capable of leading brand initiatives

Executive Summary

I led Penn Foster's complete rebrand following a major acquisition, guiding an in-house design team through their first strategic brand initiative. By implementing a rigorous research and validation process, including brand attribute workshops, persona development, competitive analysis, and user testing with 150+ participants, we developed a new visual identity that resonated with both B2B and B2C audiences. The project successfully elevated team capabilities, established data-driven design processes, and transformed the organization's perception from a legacy correspondence school to a modern eLearning leader.

Discovery: Building a Data-Driven Brand Foundation

Defining Brand Attributes

This project began with an agency-led Blue Ocean strategy session with our executives, which established our competitive positioning. To translate that strategy into actionable brand attributes, I led a series of internal workshops with cross-functional stakeholders.

I captured keywords and brand attributes from our workshops and positioning documentation, then worked with the team to organize them into six key categories:

  • Culture: Defining the brand.

  • Customer: Defining the user.

  • Voice: The brand’s tone when communicating with the user.

  • Feeling: How a user feels after having interacted with the brand.

  • Impact: The effect the brand or service has on the users’ lives.

  • X-Factor: What makes the brand unique

Brand Attribute keywords.

Final Brand Attributes

Culture: Credible, practical, supportive, approachable, proven, opening doors

Voice: Trusted friend, mentor, advocate, practical, empathetic, supportive

Customer: 60% female, needs flexibility with study time & payments, needs a better paying job, single parent or working mother, cost is a major factor.

Feeling: Motivated, welcome, empowered, assured, supported, valued

X-Factor: Scale, thousands enrolled, millions graduated, accredited by regulators and recognized by employers, middle-skill focus on in-demand jobs, social impact - economic opportunity.

Impact: Job-ready, satisfied, confident, proud, better pay, better job


Target Personas

We leveraged student survey data and conducted story-mapping workshops with student-facing employees to build detailed personas. These personas became the foundation for all design decisions, ensuring we stayed focused on the needs of our 60% female, flexibility-seeking, career-advancement-driven student base.

Trello Board of our defined personas.

Collection of various education and online learning platform logos, including Skillshare, Skillsoft, Coursera, edX, Udacity, Udemy, LinkedIn Learning, Codeacademy, Pluralsight, and university logos from Georgia, Arizona, and others.

Comparative Brand Analysis

We researched competitive and comparative brands in the higher education, edtech, and eLearning industries to identify visual trends, positioning opportunities, and differentiation strategies. This analysis informed our stylescape development and helped us avoid category clichés.

Design Validation: User-Testing Four Visual Directions

After the research phase, the team gathered their "ingredients"—brand attributes, persona insights, and competitive analysis—and began translating strategy into visual concepts. I introduced the team to stylescapes, a design presentation method that conveys visual direction through carefully curated mood boards that combine imagery, typography, color, and texture. This approach allowed us to explore multiple directions efficiently while teaching the team a valuable client presentation technique.

Design Inspiration

Each designer was assigned a set of brand attributes and built an inspiration board to establish a visual direction. This collaborative approach developed team members' strategic thinking skills while generating diverse creative concepts.

Color Palette

color palette

Penn Foster's new brand color palette was defined in parallel to our brand work through the UX/UI team's website redesign process. We collaborated closely to ensure the colors would work across both brand marketing and product design applications.

Stylescapes

Concept A: Career Confidence

Concept B: Steps to Success

Concepts C: Going Places

Concept D: Building Blocks

User Testing

To validate our designs and inform the executive decision, we conducted user preference testing through Usability Hub. We tested all four stylescape concepts with participants matching our core student demographics:

  • 150 users

  • Location: United States

  • Gender: Male & Female

  • Age: 18 – 40

  • Education Level: some high school – college graduate

  • Employment Status: Student, unemployed, part-time, full-time

  • Household Income: 40K and under

The results provided clear data on which directions resonated most with our target audience, giving executives confidence in the decision-making process.

user testing results

Preference test results.

The executive team was impressed with the rigor of our process and narrowed their choices to Concept A: Career Confidence and Concept D: Building Blocks based on both user testing data and strategic alignment.

We were given direction to refine both concepts to facilitate the final decision.

Revision Goals:

  • Incorporate more of the bold brand colors

  • Demonstrate logo options in both all caps and all title case

  • Visualize the brand for both b2b and b2c audiences

Revised Stylescapes

Final Direction

After presenting the revisions and conducting a final stakeholder review, the Career Confidence concept was selected. The team then moved into detailed brand development, creating comprehensive logo systems, brand guidelines, and application examples.

Logo Details

Final Logo

Penn Foster Horizontal Lockup

Penn Foster High School Horizontal Lockup

Brand Mark Rationale

Penn Foster Stacked Lockup

Penn Foster High School Stacked Lockup

Impact: Transforming Team Capability and Brand Perception

This rebrand was one of the most challenging and rewarding projects I led as Penn Foster's Creative Director. The success wasn't just in the final visual identity. It fundamentally transformed how our team worked and how the organization perceived our capabilities.

Business Impact

  • Unified a fragmented brand portfolio following a major acquisition

  • Modernized Penn Foster's 130-year-old brand to appeal to contemporary learners

  • Created a scalable visual system that worked across B2B (employer partnerships) and B2C (individual students) audiences

  • Established Penn Foster as a forward-thinking eLearning leader rather than a legacy correspondence school

Team Transformation:

  • Upskilled a production-focused team to lead strategic brand initiatives

  • Introduced new methodologies: Blue Ocean strategy, story mapping, stylescapes, and user testing

  • Built confidence through a structured, data-driven process that earned executive trust

  • Elevated the team's reputation from creative services to a strategic in-house agency

Process Innovation:

  • Implemented a research-first approach that became our standard for major initiatives

  • Demonstrated the value of user testing in design decisions, establishing it as an ongoing practice

  • Created reusable frameworks for brand attribute development and persona building

Key Learnings:

The biggest lesson was the power of process transparency. By involving executives in workshops, sharing research findings, and presenting user testing data, we built trust that gave the team autonomy for future projects. I also learned that upskilling works best when embedded in real projects—the team learned by doing, not through abstract training.

If I were to do this again, I would have documented the team's skill development more formally and created a case study of the transformation.